Synthetic topos theory

[004G] Subtoposes and modalities

Having [002Y] in mind, we only consider subtoposes of \(\mathord {\textnormal {\textsf {1}}}\). Subtoposes of a general topos \(X\) are subtoposes of \(\mathord {\textnormal {\textsf {1}}}\) in the type theory of spaces in \(\mathord {\textnormal {\textsf {Sh}}}(X)\).

[004H] Definition

Let \(T\) be a base type theory. We work in \(T\). We say a topos \(X\) is a subtopos (of \(\mathord {\textnormal {\textsf {1}}}\)) if the counit of the constant sheaf and global section adjunction for \(X\) is an equivalence. We write \(\mathord {\textnormal {\textsf {SubTop}}}\) for the type of subtoposes.

We refer the reader to [Rijke--Shulman--Spitters--2020-0000] for the theory of modalities in homotopy type theory.

[004I] Notation

Let \(T\) be a base type theory. We work in \(T\). Let \(X\) be a subtopos. Then the constant sheaf and global section adjunction for \(X\) yields a lex modality on \(\mathcal {U}(0)\). We refer to the lex modality as \(\mathord {\textnormal {\textsf {m}}}_{X}\).

[004J] Exercise

Let \(T\) be a base type theory. We work in \(T\). Let \(X\) be a subtopos. Then the lex modality \(\mathord {\textnormal {\textsf {m}}}_{X}\) is accessible. (This might require additional axioms.)

[004K] Notation

Let \(T\) be a base type theory. We work in \(T\). We refer to the type of lex accessible modalities on \(\mathcal {U}(0)\) as \(\mathord {\textnormal {\textsf {LAM}}}\).

[004L] Exercise

Let \(T\) be a base type theory. We work in \(T\). Then the function \(X\mapsto \mathord {\textnormal {\textsf {m}}}_{X}:\mathord {\textnormal {\textsf {SubTop}}}\rightarrow \mathord {\textnormal {\textsf {LAM}}}\) is an equivalence.